Technology

37711 readers

203 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Russia reportedly readies submarine cable 'sabotage' (www.theregister.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/2724505

Archived link

Russia's naval activity near undersea cables is reportedly drawing the scrutiny of US officials, further sparking concerns that the Kremlin may be plotting to "sabotage" underwater infrastructure via a secretive, dedicated military unit called the General Staff Main Directorate for Deep Sea Research (GUGI).

[...]

Knocking out internet and telecommunications traffic traveling across these fiber-optic cables would have a devastating effect on government, military, and private-sector communications.

More than 95 percent of international data flows through those submarine cables, which puts them at increasing risk of both cyber and physical attacks .

[...]

Last year, public broadcasters of Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Finland uncovered a Russian fleet of suspected spy ships operating in Nordic waters, reportedly for purposes of sabotaging both submarine cables and wind farms.

**In addition to communications, the cables also carry electricity between European countries. **

[...]

"Any activities that damaged seabed infrastructure including undersea cables especially during periods of heightened tensions risks misunderstandings and misperceptions that could lead to unintended escalation," [said an] US official. "The US would be especially concerned about damage to our or our allies' critical undersea infrastructure."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn't that hurt Russia as much as any other country?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Depends on which lines are affected.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

But still yes, once NATO works out which Russian stuff to take out in response.

Probably the ghost tankers, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or perhaps an unassuming office building that only has outbound VPN connections.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If it's outside Russia, sure. It's probably going to be something (or some things) in international space if it's a retaliation for something in international space. Or at least, it should be, because I don't really buy the "direct war with Russia would be fine" jerk.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

If I was running a country and preparing to cut cables like that, it would be because I'd infected the enemy with some type of virus that when activated would wreak havoc over their internet. I'd cut the cables immediately before activation. However, I might be smarter than the Russian leadership, and I don't run a country.