this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
119 points (96.9% liked)

World News

32323 readers
848 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I listened to an interview recently, I believe on BBC, where the interviewee said the biggest issue with peace talks is that the international community isn't able to trust Putin to keep his word on whatever is agreed upon. I hadn't considered that, but it makes a lot of sense and I'm not sure how that could change

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

But Putin was they only party to the previous Minsk agreements who kept his word. Merkel and then Hollande admitted that they never had any intention of honoring the agreements.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

The international community being G7 countries accounting for 15% of world population. Nobody gives a fuck what the west thinks at this point.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Russia won't be trustworthy until Putin and his fascist United Russia party are gone.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Who was the interviewee?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

it makes a lot of sense and I'm not sure how that could change

It will change when the cancer finally kills that bastard.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The same argument can be used in favor of Russia. NATO has invaded plenty of countries under false pretenses in the past. Both Russia and NATO do not have a reputation for keeping their promises.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Unironically yes, NATO members have invaded a lot of places, often in coalition with other member states.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

That's like saying Canada is responsible for something Mexico did because they're both on the same continent...

NATO is purely a defense agreement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It is more like saying the axis is known to invade nations because its member states invade nations. Okay, sure, Germany and Italy invaded the soviet union but Japan didn't, you can't say they're not a defensive alliance /s