this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
558 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59030 readers
3175 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 154 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (16 children)

If your kids' school laptops are surveilled, they're surveilled by someone. Let's call that someone Joe. Joe is a person who took a low-paying job that lets him surveil your kids. Joe likes his job, because he gets to surveil your kids. He gets to turn on the camera and look in your kids' room. He gets to read the chat messages your kids send to their classmates.

Your kids would be better off without Joe in their lives. Joe is not a source of security. Joe is not protecting your kids; Joe is a threat to them.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (11 children)

I work IT in schools. There is limited surveillance tools on college owned devices. Mainly logging of web traffic. Screens can be viewed when on campus network, not reachable off campus.

No one in our department has time to waste looking at web history or screens. Teachers don't bother to use it much either. We only look at it when directed by college executive or when I go in there at the end of term to clear the alerts.

I'd imagine most other schools are similar, no one gives a shit what kids are doing on their devices

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

no one gives a shit what kids are doing on their devices

Except Joe. And people like Joe. Whose surveillance of kids is now not only easier, but sanctioned.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Exactly. It’s like a tacit admission that the only reason to have this stuff is for people like Joe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trust me bro, joe is a good guy!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's super busy! No time to abuse our completely abuseable system...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

my highschool has 1,500 kids and 2 IT guys. We have over 100 broken laptops rn. They're overworked minimum wage workers like everyone else working at public schools. They don't even look at what kids do. I've seen only 1 story in the 4 years I've been in HS where someone actually got in trouble for messing with stuff on the computer and it was because they were trying to brute force a network password they didn't have access to.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

kids looking at porn on their school laptops is why the tools exist, not for pedos. 'Joe' is 0.001% of people, not the majority!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s a number you just made up.

Either way, use a blacklist then. If you really care about what sites they access, use a whitelist.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

use a blacklist then

They do.

That’s a number you just made up.

you're purposefully ignoring my point

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)