this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
545 points (98.6% liked)

News

23259 readers
3263 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

SAO PAULO (AP) — Elon Musk’s satellite-based internet service provider Starlink backtracked Tuesday and said it will comply with a Brazilian Supreme Court justice’s order to block the billionaire’s social media platform, X.

Starlink said in a statement posted on X that it will heed Justice Alexandre de Moraes’ order despite him having frozen the company’s assets. Previously, it informally told the telecommunications regulator that it would not comply until de Moraes reversed course.

“Regardless of the illegal treatment of Starlink in freezing our assets, we are complying with the order to block access to X in Brazil,” the company statement said. “We continue to pursue all legal avenues, as are others who agree that @alexandre’s recent order violate the Brazilian constitution.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sorry... you think the democratic thing would be to legalize child porn?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If the internet is being used to distribute child porn would you ban the internet?

You can’t just keep banning everything that is used to commit a crime, because criminals will find a way to use everything to commit crimes.

Yeah, that telegram porn accusation is pretty disappointing, but let’s not pretend for a moment that any government actually gives a shit about it. It’s being used to have conversations they can’t see, and that’s why they are using child porn—the silver bullet—to take them down.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If the internet is being used to distribute child porn would you ban the internet?

You would ban the site, and any company refusing to ban the site (FREE SPEECH!!!!!) would then also be banned.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But that doesn’t fix the issue. They switch sites. You have to ban the internet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But that doesn’t fix the issue. They switch sites. You have to ban the internet.

And yet, somehow, governments do manage to block it without banning the internet. It's a miracle! Governments must be magic!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And yet, even after being blocked, the issue persists elsewhere. Nothing is solved! Go go government bullshit!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"It's everywhere you look! I can't open a single folder on my computer without finding more of it!"

What was your location again?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You just resort to personal insults when you’ve been beat.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Been beat? You didn't even make an argument, just assumed nonsense was true.

Does it exist? Yes. Is it everywhere? Hardly. Does the ban significantly reduce access and availability? Yes.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You just resort to running away when you've been beat.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Look, the conversation was over when you started making personal attacks instead of staying on topic. It’s just the internet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The conversation was over when you kept insisting nothing could be done unless you ban the internet entirely, despite reality proving that wrong.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You knew I was being facetious—I hope.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You knew I was being facetious—I hope.

Considering that was the only thing resembling an argument in your post, I guess that means the conversation was over when you immediately gave up on trying to defend your argument and only posting something facetious.

Strange how you post something completely facetious and that's fine, I reply with something facetious and you cry foul and run away.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It wasn’t a personal attack. There’s no point to that here. This is clearly upsetting you. I suggest we stop here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It wasn’t a personal attack

You knew I was being facetious—I hope.