this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
260 points (91.4% liked)

World News

32308 readers
981 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Israel has been explicit about what it’s carrying out in Gaza. Why isn’t the world listening?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

The world is listening. But the world is not allowed to say anything because the moment they criticise Israel's government they are obviously evil anti-semites that should be shot on the spot.

Right now every single article criticising Israel's government is drowned out by two dozen articles about all those despicable anti-semites everywhere excusing Hamas terrorism. Doesn't matter that it's a lie, that noone actually excused those terrorist acts. It's just a rediculous over the top strawman.

But this ist our new post-factual reality. Those who scream their lie the loudest are right.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hamas Rebels carried out an effective terrorist attack in retaliation to years of GLOBALLY SANCTIONED terrorism at the hands if Israel.

Now what was are observing is Israel quadrupling down on their terrorist activities whilst simultaneously waging an infowar.

Who do you think is more equipped to wage an infowar? A first world, heavily subsidized, safe government with all of the state of the art technology a little terrorist state can ask for? Or a poor destitute region whose infrastructure has been absolutely devastated over the decades, is again getting pummeled at full force, where hundreds if not thousands are getting ruthlessly slaughtered daily?

And Israel is STILL losing the infowar.

Why? Because the people of the world know exactly what is occurring but the governments of the world are so overwhelmingly corrupt that they maintain status quo so they also continue to get their shares of the subsidies.

Earth is fucked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hamas didn’t do a terrorist attack. A war crime, sure. A terrorist attacked, no.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I'm genuinely intrigued by how you separate those terms in reference to the Hamas attack on the music festival.

Not being confrontational. I'm struggling with a mean does or does not equal average does or does not descriptive statistic conversation on another thread.

Off the cuff, my take has been "Hamas is a terrorist organization. The Israeli Military is a much bigger and more agregious terrorist organization. Let them have eachother and let Israili and Palestinian civilians make music together".

So here I am genuinely interested in your (and anyone elses) answer to "what is a terrorist attack, and how does it differ from a war crime? Bonus points: In current events, explain how Hamas has committed war crimes, but not terrorist attacks?"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Western media are experts at lying to manufacture consent for wars and xenophobia against all their enemies too. As we've seen over the last week, they're all to ready to accept it without questioning.

The nariyah testimony, gulf of tonkin, colin powell holding up the fake proof of iraq's "wmds", and so many more that pro-US ppl are not yet ready to come to terms with, or question their own biases.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People & governments of the Global South have plenty to say right now, though few of us in the Global North will hear them unless we go out of our way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ja, ne. Du bedienst hier doch auch ne Strohpuppe. Die Welt darf nichts sagen? Komm, du weisst das stimmt nicht. Sonst würde doch auch keiner wissen, wie beschissen es in Gaza aussieht. Dass Israel dort noch nicht einmarschiert ist, zeigt wie sehr auch die westliche Gemeinschaft das israelische Militär vom Schlimmsten abhalten will. Ich weiss nicht, was du liest, aber schau dir mal den Guardian gerade an. Hier gibt es eine Vielfalt an Stimmen zum Konflikt. Vertreter Israel‘s, Gründer des BSD, geben hier sehr konträre Ansichten. Aber auch in deutschen Medien wird doch nicht wenig auf das Leid der Palästinenser hingewiesen. Dass Leute, die Hamas und ihre verabscheuungswürdigen Taten zum Befreiungskampf stilisieren, zurechtgewiesen werden, gerade halt auch in unserem Land, sollte dich nicht so radikalisieren.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

noone actually excused those terrorist acts.

In Professor Joseph Massad’s newest article on The Electronic Intifada, he wrote that the attack that occurred in Israel on October 7th was a “stunning victory” and that Hamas' actions were “astounding,” “awesome,” and “incredible.”

And he doesn't teach at some no name place either. Dude teaches at Columbia

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

....and not one of those evil words is an ethical judgement, yet, you choose to interpret them this way, because in a black and white narrative, every speck of dust on your white narrative, must mean the other person is completely in camp black.

This is exactly what was criticized above. There's no room for any thought. It's just Israel, fuck yeah! or antisemite; Palestine, fuck yeah! or genocide supporter.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

your white narrative

Tell the Nazis my narrative is white. Tell the country clubs that banned dogs, blacks, and jews as recently as 60 years ago that my narrative is white. Tell the guy who shot up a synagogue in Pittsburgh and thought Trump was bad because he wasn't tough on Jews that my narrative isn't white. It's amazing how we are somehow both nonwhite outsiders looking to destroy the fabric of society or European imperialists looking to uphold it and it's whichever one the person viewing us thinks is bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And literally nothing of that has anything to do with waht you wrote before. Nothing. You jumped from "Gaza had succeses" to "this guy is antisemitic" to "if you think, this is not antisemitic, you are literally enabling violence". That is just wrong.

Again, you are unable or unwilling to accept, that "your side" can also be bad. Both sides can be bad at the same time. The Holocaust doesn't justify violence today, just as the Naqba doens't justifiy violence today.

People like you would thrive under McCarthy, Stalin or the Stasi.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

just as the Naqba doens’t justifiy violence today.

Sooo... Palestinians should just accept their genocide quietly?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

And literally nothing of that has anything to do with waht you wrote before.

Correct. It has to do with the thing that I quoted from your comment just before writing it

Again, you are unable or unwilling to accept, that "your side" can also be bad.

Not at all. I'm not a fan of the idf or Israeli government at all. The problem is that despite the fact that they do a lot of bad stuff they're at least wouldn't exterminate the other side of they (the other side) laid their weapons down tomorrow. If the idf laid their weapons down we would see more slaughter like October 7th followed by the forces and complete dissolution of the state of Israel. It doesn't excuse some of the things the idf does but it's what makes the idf the better of the two for whatever that's worth.

The Holocaust doesn't justify violence today, just as the Naqba doens't justifiy violence today.

The correct. What justifies violence is a valid argument that it's being done in self defense. And right now Israel definitely has that.