Asklemmy

43788 readers

768 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

If the US stayed out of other countries politics and there were no coups or installation of people favorable to the US what would the world look like? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

On a tangentially related note, this documentary series from BBC4 is a fascinating insight into the decision making process the US went through over dealing with foreign mass atrocities over the past 40 years: Iraq, Bosnia, Rwanda, Syria etc.

Warning: they do not hold back with the imagery of these events.

Corridors of Power: Should America Police the World?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Did they also go into mass atrocities committed and initiated by the US? If you go around lighting fires and then come back around to put them out after donning an official uniform, should others consider you a fire fighter or an arsonist?

Is there a single instance covered that wasn't a situation the US directly and purposely had a hand in creating?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You should watch it and find out for yourself.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I will, but this is an 8 hour series.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I know, I watched it all.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Any chance you'd be willing to provide answers to any of my questions based on what you saw?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Do you have any non-rhetorical questions on the topic?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Your questions aren’t really questions now are they?

Did they also go into mass atrocities committed and initiated by the US?

Not OP, didn’t watch the series. This is the kind of question you could answer by watching and if you aren’t interested in watching unsure why you’d ask.

If you go around lighting fires and then come back around to put them out after donning an official uniform, should others consider you a fire fighter or an arsonist?

I guess if we’re talking about this literal situation, you’d be both? Is this what you claim is happening?

Is there a single instance covered that wasn't a situation the US directly and purposely had a hand in creating?

They mentioned the Rwandan genocide. Do you consider the Rwandan genocide to be one of those “fires” that the US “lit”?