this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
112 points (91.2% liked)

Fediverse

17724 readers
3 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
112
Threads deepens its ties to the open social web, aka the ‘fediverse’ (techcrunch.com)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"Threads is deepening its ties to the fediverse, also known as the open social web, which powers services like X alternative Mastodon, Pixelfed, PeerTube, Flipboard and other apps. On Wednesday, Meta announced that users on Threads will be able to see fediverse replies on other posts besides their own. In addition, posts that originated through the Threads API, like those created via third-party apps and scheduling services, will now be syndicated to the fediverse. The latter had previously been announced via an in-app message informing users that API posts would be shared to the fediverse starting on August 28."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 88 points 2 months ago (49 children)

Daily reminder to defederate from and block threads.net (and optionally all instances that do not do the same).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Defedding from threads always seems strange to me. Everyone says it's to protect your data from meta. But they can already get your data. Everything on the fediverse is public. They already have your data.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Public is not the same as public domain.

I'm not a lawyer, but Federation would probably imply consent to sharing the data. Whereas defederation would strongly imply you're not okay with sharing the data with that entity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You think they don't collect data illegally and anonymise it (but keep cohorts) for market research already? You sweet summer child

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

What I think or what they "may" do is irrelevant regarding public data. What matters is sending a clear signal what you are and are not okay with.

Whether you actively participate in helping them get your data or not might not effectively matter in them acquiring it, but it may heavily impact the fine they get for it afterwards. You might be okay with them getting your data for free, but I'm not, sweet summer child.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)