this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
11 points (82.4% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
585 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Agreed. I already don't trust car automation. No way I'm going to add a 3rd dimension to the list of possible failures.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What makes car automation so difficult is the fact that you have to account for human drivers and pedestrians. Flight automation might actually be an easier problem if all the vehicles are autonomous from the start and communicate with each other. You're also not flying bumper to bumper the way you drive on a road, so you have a much wider margin for collision avoidance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is at least a different problem, but adding in the element that any failure is a fatal one it just isn't enough that there are less obstacles in the way.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Sure it's a different problem, but chances of fatal accidents in cars are already significantly higher than in commercial air travel now. And same argument applies to planes.