Memes

45629 readers

1165 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

418

A King regardless (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Let's not body shame

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure!

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1555137

Relative to normal weight, both obesity (all grades) and grades 2 and 3 obesity were associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality. Grade 1 obesity overall was not associated with higher mortality, and overweight was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks! Both look like very decent studies so I am not certain where the difference comes from. I suspect that the division into age brackets, or averaging across all of the them may be the cause. Either way, it seems that the effects of being slightly overweight are barely statistically significant. The more you know

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If I've read it correctly, being overweight is "healthier" for longevity. My understanding of science is that being overweight isn't unhealthy, quite the opposite, but its closeness to obesity is the true danger. So it is healthy to be "overweight" according to BMI, but it's close to being obese, which is very unhealthy, so if you don't watch yourself, you could hurt yourself. Aiming to be in the high "normal" BMI or low "overweight" BMI is probably the most reasonable approach. But it may be more difficult for people who build muscle to tell what that is for them.