World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Yes, and?
It's intentionally misleading to only talk about the first six when there are forty-nine thousand, nine-hundred and ninty four more rooms each with twenty alive kids, when you're making allegations of genocidal and tent and war crimes.
You really don't see that?
No I don't see it. I didn't realise there was an acceptable number of children per capita to shoot and kill.
Really? I'm surprised you didn't know that. I remember my first war.
Well given your apparent wealth of experience maybe you can help the rest of us out. How many kids is it acceptable to shoot before we're allowed to count them?
I wouldn't float a guess. That's a decision for democratically elected governments to make.
Well, I only asked because you seemed to have an opinion on that before. Glad to see you distancing yourself from the implications of your comment though, it really is the only palatable move once you've put yourself in that corner isn't it
The corner of acknowledging the realities warfare and governance by having been well read and traveled?
I get it. It's your first war. It will always feel special.
No no no, you didn't "acknowledge the realities of warfare and governance (governance, wtf?)". Your position was that it's dishonest to point out the number of children shot and killed by the IDF because they still have plenty of spare ones anyway. I honestly can't believe I'm not even strawmaning you with this and that is a real thing that someone who's apparently a human being genuinely thinks.
For what it's worth, I do remember my first war. I had no problem going out on the street and protesting the immoral actions of my own government. I certainly never told anyone not to complain about children being shot and killed. No amount of reading or travelling will make me stoop so low and you're simply lying to yourself if you think it's because you're smarter than everyone else that you're cool with the murder of children.
You know what is a first for me though, seeing someone being such a condescending prick about others having a problem with children being shot and killed. Hopefully it's also a last but I somehow doubt it.
That's you making up that I am cool with children getting murder. You are straw manning. If my argument is so bad why do you need to put up a straw man? And call me names?
Well you certainly don't seem to be particularly bothered by it, let's put it that way. And you can accuse me of strawmaning if you want but your position was that it is dishonest to point out the number of children killed because there are still lots more children that haven't been killed yet. Feel free to correct me, honestly I would love to be wrong about that.
And yeah I'm going to call you a condescending prick if you are going to pretend like you are somehow more well read and travelled than some stranger you know nothing about because they disagree with you. That's condescending prick behaviour which I will call out. If your argument is so good why is the only thing you can do in your defence pretend that you must be smarter than others?
You're still misrepresenting my position, strawmanning, and resorting to insults. You want me to be as emotional and indignant about this as you, regardless of how I actually feel about it, and I'm not, and that's got you all fired up at me. You're probably, sincerely, a really good person. At this point you'll forgive my condescension after two rounds of your flagrant misrepresentations and insults. You seem obviously immature or inexperienced, or both, to me, anyway. ✌️
Well, I'd say you are a good person too but I really don't know anything about you. Other than you are very uncomfortable having your position read back to you and you think you are very smart. Maybe it's time to re-evaluate some of your self beliefs, it's ok to be wrong! Most people who claim to be smart to the point of using it as a defence of their position probably aren't that good at introspection but hopefully it's something you'll grow out of.
Or maybe I'm wrong and I just haven't travelled to enough countries yet to see it. If I have a sudden realisation next time I'm stepping off the plane I'll come back and let you know.