politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I don't think he needs a defense, honestly. If ever there was a legitimate right-wing claim of free speech it's a presidential candidate being able to visit with and address whoever he or she chooses.
But the rest of us are also free to deduce what we will from who he chooses to stump to.
Agreed. It's good that they're now saying the quiet parts out loud. We can see that there's definitely a pattern of racism in Trump's actions. Those of us that are secure don't have to support it.
He's been saying the quiet part out loud since he took out a full page ad in New York, demanding the incarceration of the Central Park Five.
He called for the death penalty for the Central Park Five.
ETA: source
Yes, my fault.
Agreed. But it seems odd he's out there preaching to the choir while Harris is touring battleground states.
That's a fair point but I think it comes down to the fact that the only part of his mind that hasn't been consumed by whatever brain rot he's got going on seems to be his ego. In that light, it's totally logical. (for Trump)
Not to put words in the previous posters mouth but my thoughts are that he is riling up his militant base in anticipation of either getting jail time or losing the election so that the most violent individuals in his base of support would maybe protect and fight for him. I think that was what the previous poster was inferring.
Ah good point I didn't catch that. Stochastic terrorism is definitely a Trump MO, so I agree there also!
Man anyone can be a presidential candidate. He’s the nominee.
Sure, but anyone has the right to address who they want. (And as noted, have that pattern noticed...)
I’m just saying that’s the reason it matters, I could address myself as a Presidential Candidate but no one is gonna care until Im the nominee. Beyond that, Trump’s immunity comes from that fact, or at least some semblance of it.