this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
173 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2698 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Some men just hate that women have bodily functions but in this case its because they believe that tampons have sexual undertones because it involves insertion. For a long time in England, only married women were allowed to buy them and I can only assume that there were similar rules in The US.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As prudish as America is, I’ve never heard that before. Not saying it’s not the case though.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Lol it's not a thing. I have no idea what lemmy people go on about sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

https://www.ahpma.co.uk/menstruation_facts_and_figures/

  • Until as late as the 1950’s, every packet of tampons had to carry the warning ‘Not suitable for unmarried women’ for fear that virginity might be impaired, which was of course untrue. To this day however, in predominately Catholic countries, sales of pads are notably higher than tampons.

Fucking Lemmy people making me do research.

An additional source that I am unable to find is Jo Brand on an episode of QI talking about stores refusing to sell tampons to unmarried women.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I guess I don't know much about the Uk or other countries, I'm just speaking for my experience in the US.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But you you did know enough to be smug about it, apparently. These crazy Lemmy people saying such silly things.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm not saying it never happened, just that it isn't a thing anymore, not in any mainstream sense. Obviously there are small communities or whatever. There always are, but they are not representative of any significant group of people and can't be pointed to as an example of some kind. This is the kind of thing lemmy/reddit does all the time that gets really annoying. It's low effort circle jerking, and people just eat it up because it makes them feel superior.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did you miss the part where Catholic and conservative countries still uses tampons less than other countries. The main issue is that they think it

A. Increase masturbation because it requires the girl to familiarize themselves with their own genitals

And

B. Breaks the hymen and makes the girl no longer a virgin.

These are things that conservatives absolutely still care about and if you read r/twoXchromosomes you will eventually see women with conservative parents having to snuggle their tampons into the house.

Also, why are conservatives losing their minds over Tim Walz providing tampons to schools if what I am saying isn't a thing anymore?

Like a presidential candidate once said, things dont just fall out of coconut trees. They are influenced by what was before.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The tampon thing is about requiring schools to put them in the boys bathrooms, which is a totally different thing. But also my response is about my experience in the US.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lots of experience being a far right conservative in America?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How do you define far right? I'd guess most of the people around me would be considered far right by lemmy standards, and I'm not aware of any of them being concerned about tampons. But maybe I just don't know about the real far right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, I just think you are stupid and not very curious about why people hold the opinions they hold. Common problem with republicans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Let me just point out that being hostile to people who challenge your preconceived notions is not a sign of great intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you went from asserting a thing doesn't happen, to admitting you're talking out of your ass, to doubling down again on a subject you've just said you know nothing about? Talk about clowns on the internet lmao

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

That one hit a little close to home?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It is absolutely a thing among conservative circles. I've known young women whose own mothers scared them away from using tampons because they said it would break the hymen and then you could no longer prove you're a virgin (or some claim that you truly aren't a virgin anymore, as though you can lose your virginity to a tampon) so then you'll be considered unclean and no decent man will want you anymore.

It's gobsmackingly stupid but it is very very real.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s definitely “a thing” in the US, but the comment I replied to said only married women were “allowed” to buy them. I took that to mean allowed by law.

Maybe that was too much of an assumption.

Regardless, we’re talking about power structures denying bodily autonomy to women which, I think we can agree, is fucking disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

It was not legally enforced but it was socially enforced trough stores refusing to sell them to you and mothers calling you a whore if they find them in your room.

https://feddit.nu/comment/9831035

This source is paired with multiple posts on r/XYchromosomes where their mothers associates tampons with being sexually active and an anecdote from Jo Brand on QI where she casually talks about having to use disgusting rags because the store would not sell her tampons.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m in my late 30s. My public school warned against tampons and told us we should ask our mothers before we use them because it could damage our hymens. Wait until you’re older they said. It was highschool.

They were vague about it but it was a school health class. Rural America.

So yes it was a thing for me. Hopefully schools have updated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Wasn't my experience, but I will take your word for it. I'd heard of it of course, but always in a vague, third-hand kind of way, or like it used to be a thing when they first came out. Caveat: I'm a guy. But that said I'm surrounded by very conservative and religious people and my wife is from an even more conservative part of the country, and the tampon thing was never an issue. She says she never even heard about that, and the only thing related to tampons she remembers was about risk of toxic shock if you leave them in too long.