this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
767 points (96.3% liked)

World News

40512 readers
3017 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 98 points 6 months ago (4 children)

All Olympians are genetic outliers. Do you really want to be the DNA police? Then every Michael Phelps medal should be returned because that man is naturally different from the rest of us. But he's a man so we're not talking about him.

https://www.biography.com/athletes/michael-phelp-perfect-body-swimming

[–] [email protected] 64 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Seriously. Phelps is pretty much genetically ideal for a swimmer, but nobody claimed it was "UnfAiR!!" when he swept the board multiple olympics in a row, garnering more gold medals than anyone in history, before or since.

One female boxer looks a bit "too" muscular and the bigots are up in arms. Fucking assholes.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago

And Khelif lost plenty of bouts in her career, but somehow, those aren’t relevant because, “I know a man when I see one.”

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (14 children)

I actually encountered someone a couple of days ago herr on Lemmy that said it was unfair of Phelps to compete because he was too genetically superior. It was bizarre. Course it was on a thread about Phelps criticizing Chinese athletes who were doping so I imagine it was just a tankie trying his best.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Was it him or Lance Armstrong that ended up getting caught doping? Pretty sure it was the latter, but also recall Phelps getting accused of something. If could've even been something irrelevant like marijuana.

Agree with your point, though.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

And poor Sha'Carri

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Lance Was the one that got accu of doping. He never got caught. Just didn't contest charges by the anti doping agency after he retired anyway.

But also, everyone seems to do it in cycling.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure he was caught. Like proven. It's just they caught like virtually every other cyclist in that same race.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

It was so bad that there are 6 Tours De France without winners because he and so many people behind him were all disqualified.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

This is honestly an argument that I find very weak. I mean absolutely there are plenty of genetic advantages in general in sport. The problem is that not all sports have categories to isolate competitions for certain parameters. Swimming does not, so you could argue that is unfair by default, but that's what it is right now. Fighting sports generally do have categories, both gender and weight.

If we leave alone gender, if someone had some condition (let's imagine something that doesn't exist) that would result in having muscle mass common for a 80Kg, but in a 70Kg body, that person would probably have an unfair advantage in the 70Kg category because weight is a proxy for muscle mass as well.

The only reasonable argument here is that the boxer, even if she has some genetic condition, still tested within the limits for female boxers. That is pretty much it, which means that whatever condition she has (if any), it's not considered an advantage in the female category according to current standards.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (27 children)

What's interesting is Katie Ledecky can beat him on long distance swims, if we go by their times. So how much of an advantage is gender in many sports at this level? And let's look at disability - Usain Bolt had/has scoliosis, Ledecky has POTS, and many other athletes have "disabling" conditions. So why would intersex get a special category that isn't allowed? It's just transphobia.

Here’s a source for Katie Ledecky beating Phelps: https://www.essentiallysports.com/us-sports-news-olympics-news-swimming-news-is-katie-ledecky-faster-than-michael-phelps-answering-the-burning-question-of-the-swimming-community-before-us-olympic-trials/

load more comments (27 replies)