this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
436 points (98.2% liked)

News

23311 readers
4163 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Virginia man was charged with making violent online threats against U.S. Vice-President Kamala Harris days after she began her U.S. presidential campaign.

Frank Carillo was charged on Friday in federal court in Virginia with threatening the vice-president after posting a series of messages targeting Harris on the social media site GETTR, according to court records.

“Kamala Harris needs to be put on fire alive I will do it personally if no one else does," read one post cited in court documents. Another said Harris is "going to regret ever trying to become president."

The messages were posted on July 27, six days after President Joe Biden announced he would not run for re-election and endorsed Harris to take his place as the Democratic candidate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Don't upvote this thing until it's reporting correctly in a manner consistent with the actual historical bias of the publication and any relevant facts. Right now it seems to be an LLM that is "summarizing"; which LLMs cannot do as they are essentially very convoluted predictive text. This is essentially an advertisement for Ground News. A third party that is affecting the Overton Window. Who gains from a single source of truth in the media? It's not the reader I am certain of that.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

(Haven't used Ground News but have seen some adverts for it)

I like the concept Ground News claims to be going for, which is just listing all the different media outlets reporting on a story so that the reader can do what they will with the additional context. I'm not as OK with media bias fact check, and if Ground News is trying to integrate it in some way on their service, I don't think that's good either. the whole point of Ground News seemed to me to be trying to explicitly NOT tell the reader what to think about a given article, and MBFC would undermine that IMO

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Ground News's whole thing is they rate sources on a far right to far left scale and use that to compare stories. I tried it (the free version) and found it to be at best a news aggregator that gives you their opinion of media bias. In theory it sounded great, in practice I didn't find a whole lot of value in it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

What's wrong with media bias fact check? Is it itself biased?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is it itself biased?

It has a bias towards American Centrism and that seems to make left of center folks in other parts of the world very angry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

American “centrism” is far to the right of what any civilised country would consider far right, and accelerating further right every second.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

It calls the Associated Press a leftist outlet. It’s just shitty conservative propaganda that is attempting to shift the Overton Window.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

It has the possibility to be like anything else, I cannot say whether it is or not. but it's more that I would prefer to move in a direction towards people thinking more critically about the news they consume, and MBFC is offering to shortcut that process, which I don't like

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Right now it seems to be an LLM that is “summarizing”

That isn't at all how MBFC works. Their methodology is clearly explained right here: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/methodology/

If you'd like to know who rated CTV and when it was last done you can find that information here: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ctv-news/

Honestly I'm really beginning to believe that the people bitching about MBFC (and Ground News too) aren't upset by some notion of a "single source of truth" but rather because their lies are being exposed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wait, I'm not sure I understand correctly... How is a CTV News article credited to Reuters an advertisement for Ground News?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

The bot comment, not the article.