this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
114 points (82.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5726 readers
1504 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Why? I have a HP tattoo and don't regret it. The fandom has gone past the author at this point. She's a hateful removed but that doesn't mean that we can't still love the world and characters she created. We've made it our own.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Except she still gets royalties and uses those to donate to political organizations, so you know

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (41 children)

Tons of ways to enjoy the fandom without giving her any money.

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Why not sail the high seas?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Last time I checked it was a little more complicated than that. I think the Wizarding World is now owned by WB, whereas Harry Potter is where Rowling gets royalties. That's where the distinction between the two lives, which is why there are so many things being spun up lately.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I don't know how involved she still is but I know back in 2010ish when universal was opening the wizarding world in Orlando they had to run all the design desicisions through Rowling. The park ended up changing the color of the name tags for just the workers in that area of the park because she thought the white on them was to bright.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

At my last job, the only who was in his 50s or older and was nice to the trans employee had HP tattoos. He saw JK being a terf (we taught him the word) as her (referring to Rowling) own problem to solve.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They instance they're on automatically censors certain words the admins consider slurs. "Bitch" is one of them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

wow thats pretty unnecessary for regular swears lmao

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

You mean the world where slaves like to be slaves and trying to release them is wrong, apartheid is right because the other sentient people look different, the bankers are antisemitic stereotypes and the main character becomes a literal cop enforcing all this?

It's really a magical world /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

None of that is correct.

  • The slave thing was about brainwashing and exploitation, and how it's wrong.
  • I don't know what you're referring to with the apartheid thing.
  • The goblins are antisemitic because they have big noses? That's been a staple of goblin anatomy since they were created.
  • The main character becomes an anti dark sorcerer guy, like counterterrorism, so nothing to do with enforcing all that gubbins anyway.

Oh, and thanks for the '/s'. You know, otherwise I really would've thought you were giving it a compliment after a full paragraph of invective.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

apartheid is right because the other sentient people look different

This is what the fucking bad guys believe, it's not like the books are advocating for apartheid. What the hell kind of criticism is this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

What species are allowed to use a wand and attend Hogwarts?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What other species has wizards?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

At least goblins and giants and the wand ban is broad enough to imply more.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If they're a reader of fanfiction that is typically one of the major changes to the story that's done. Fanfiction has effectively rewritten the entire series to be more palatable at this point. Bonus points that you can read it without giving Rowling any money too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the fanbase needs to rewrite the entire series to be "more palatable" that might indicate something about the series itself.

Might be time for people to just move on to a different series.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

That's a tall order with how most people act. Disney vibes anyone? There were few things that could capture a whole generation's imagination so strongly, and people want to bond over it. My stance is taking what you like and making new things is how we get new series's, and fanfic has it's place in that.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Have you seen the two hour video by Shaun on the books? I highly recommend it for a look back on the books and the issues that we couldn't have picked up on as kids but are pretty obvious on a reread.

They're not as great as we remember them to be (if I have to read the phrase "mannish hands" or another word about a 16 year old girls "square jawline" again I think I might vomit) and if the best parts of the world are the bits created in spite of the author, why continue to associate it with her work. Obviously, it's easier said than done when you're talking about an entire community, but there's plenty of other worlds created by nicer authors.

The best thing to come out of the series was the cast from the movies being as cool as they are today, but any time I think of the world, all I can think of is the token diversity characters named things like Shacklebolt and Cho Chang (almost, but not quite Ching Chong), the young Irish boy obsessed with whiskey and explosives, and the defense of slavery that's identical to arguments from actual slave owners in the US.

Plus, there's the whole thing with the hook-nosed bankers that totally aren't Jewish stereotypes. You know who created a fantasy race based on Jews that doesn't feel like an offensive stereotype? Tolkien. Tolkien's dwarves are based on Jewish stereotypes, but don't come off that way at all because of how they're presented in the world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Anyone who thinks "shacklebolt" is some sort of callback to slavery need to have their brain rebooted. That's Qanon levels of pattern-finding.

load more comments (1 replies)