this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32297 readers
697 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.li/10BV3

The unmanned craft was due to make a soft landing on the Moon's south pole, but failed after encountering problems as it moved into its pre-landing orbit.

It was Russia's first Moon mission in almost 50 years.

Russia has been racing to the Moon's south pole against India, whose Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft is scheduled to land on there next week.

No country has ever landed on the south pole before, although both the US and China have landed softly on the Moon's surface.

No report on whether or not Russia was attempting to use repurposed anti-ship missiles like the ones they use to attack schools and hospitals here on Earth.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This but unironically. In general though, there is nothing more galling than liberals complaining about Russia. You made it this way. This is on you. First you destroy the soviet union, then you reconfigure the politics and economy of Russia, and then you have the audacity to complain about the very thing you caused.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"You made me do this" is literal abuser logic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

very-intelligent

Don't compare committing a violent coup against them with not having dinner ready you cynical piece of shit

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The soviet union destroyed itself because it was an unstable pile of dogshit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Most thoughtful liberal political analysis.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Man, we needed you decades ago. Imagine how much money we could have saved on thr cold war. All that threatening to destroy the planet for nothing. The genocides we did? Judt big oopsies

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, well known liberal checks notes George Bush.

Russia cannibalised itself after the Soviet Union fell, didn't need any Western help there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Political Liberal not “social liberal”

Bush was a capital L Liberal Capitalist

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean economic liberal? Bush was far from politically liberal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In the sense of “liberal” as used in political philosophy or how the word is applied to party names in most countries around the world, yes Bush was a liberal. Americans tend to use the word differently though, since both major US parties are pro-business liberal parties, of a sort. This maybe applies a bit less to the Republicans today than in did in GHW Bush’s day, although by how much is still up for debate.