this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
235 points (98.4% liked)

Ukraine

8066 readers
564 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The maximum range for the F16 in "ferry" mode (max fuel, no weapons, pee before takeoff) is something like 4000km. The distance from Belfast (Maine) to Belfast (the original) is 4500km.

That would mean air to air refueling, which is expensive and risky. It would put major wear on the planes, which are not the newest to start with. And unlike the Antonov, the F16 comes with neither legroom nor bathrooms.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

pee before takeoff)

Iirc the factor that limited early nuclear submarines the most from continuous dives was the toilets, they have limited storage for sewage and it turns out that draining those with a greater outside pressure is a pretty difficult task, at least if you want to stay undetected.

Now that they have figured that out the limiting factor is food.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You didn't explain how they sorted it out so I'm assuming compost toilets or some form of slow torpedo that makes it look like the sub is pooing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the F16 comes with neither legroom nor bathrooms.

But at maximum speed, it could in theory cover the 4500km in just over 2h (but probably with worse fuel economy and less range)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

There's no way it can get anywhere near that range at full speed. Fighters need to use afterburners to get up to max speed, and F16s run out of fuel in about 10 minutes when using afterburner.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sourly 6 hours flight time is not significant wear.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You might be misunderstanding that statistic.

That's something like, this Squadron had n hours flight time and consumed n*17 hours maintenance.

That doesn't mean a 1 hour flight increases required maintenance by 17 hours.