this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
38 points (89.6% liked)
Asklemmy
43851 readers
1703 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My thought is hackers hacked and pushed a crash, CEO has to claim it was an untested update to save face.
That would be nice, but I suspect it is a lot simpler. Low or no QC pushed a fuct update out.
I did too but looks like comment section believes this was a genuine fuck up... But yeah prolly management under staffing and underpaying somebody.
Scary to think one software is a failure point of this magnitude...if any foreign state hackers didn't already know the world's failure point, they certainly do now
That's my thinking also, the execs at these companies don't really care. They are there to make the money. If they fuck up, they just lose their job likely still get paid out too. So for them there is every incentive to take risks.