this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
74 points (83.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2831 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The bottom line: Don't underestimate how badly some Democrats simply want a ticket that can win in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Win those, and Democrats likely win the presidency. Lose them, they're toast.

It would seem that a Gretchen Whitmer / Mark Kelly ticket could get them that if they get enough exposure nationwide. Not sure if Kamala Harris and whomever she chooses would... and it would not be great if she is forced down our throats. Could they even get another primary going before the convention?

Interesting times ahead. Not fun, but interesting.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Maybe keeping Harris as VP would avoid the issues with either pushing her out or making her the nominee.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I would hope that Harris is more pragmatic and clear-eyed about the situation than Biden has been thus far - specifically, that she understands the goal is literally just to stop the fascists from taking over, and build bulwarks against that. Biden doesn’t seem to get the first one, and has utterly failed to do the second by any meaningful metric.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It’s because Biden and the rest of the octogenarian neo-liberals have been used to hanging out with their political rivals and playing like it’s a game TV wrestling.

I kept thinking Jan 6th almost resulting in their literal lynchings by that insurrectionist mob would have snapped the beltway folks into focusing immediately on what they need to be doing right now, but Biden and the rest still act like Mitt Romney, John McCain, and even Mitch McConnell are the overwhelming majority of Rs in power. I don’t think Biden and many of these other old fucks realize how many Marjorie Taylor Greene’s and Lauren Boebert’s and Matt Gates there are in positions of power now.

They will literally end their political enemies’ lives if they get back in full control of all 3 branches this time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

It’d be fucking awesome if the Democratic Party leadership would realize that it’s not poker anymore and that bringing a deck of cards to a gunfight is going to make you lose the gunfight.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. Thought about that. Just don't know how she'd take it. Guess it will be up to the Dems to convince her... if any of this even happens.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

and were biden to withdraw and she were to take the VP position for another term, it would improve her standing in my mind tremendously. selflessness (or at least delayed gratifcation) is an attribute you want to see in a leader.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm not understanding the procedure here but Biden picked Harris. Wouldn't a different nominee have the right to name the VP of their choosing?

I guess the best way forward is an open primary. If Harris wants the nomination she should run like any other candidate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

not disagreeing with you. a primary and delegate vote should asolutely rewrite the ticket. I am suggesting that, if the path of least resistance passes through kamala, I am not going to throw a a hissyfit as long as delegates get a fair vote on the presidential nominee.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Gavin Newsom has basically been Biden's media presence for much of the presidency. White male not very left I'd expect him as a contender for Harris' running mate as the DNC continues chasing the theoretical moderate.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm in California and like Newsom as a governor overall.

Ask me about how he's handled a few things and I'll tell you he's likely not fit for a post-primary introduction to the national stage. He needs vetted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

poke, poke... just a quick list to investigate on?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

The PG&E dealings don't look great. And even if he's clean, he's apt to look goofy.

French Laundry during COVID has mostly played out, but I still think it plays to character.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Former Senator and A.G. from California with current Governor from California to get Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin voters? I dunno.

I think they'd both be fine as President/Vice-President and I'd vote for that ticket. I just don't see the excitement and energy they'd bring... other than being younger than the other side. They will be listed as elites from the right.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

The right will call anyone other than themselves as whatever they feel like. Biden is just slightly left of center (for the US) and they call him a leftist. Honestly just being a decade plus younger would be massive imo. Not constantly having potential dementia being talked about would be great. Biden has been decent policywise minus Gaza. Policy is good enough for the avg voter looking at status quo>facism. He's not left enough for a lot of us (e.g. stacking the court) here on lemmy but if you ask the avg person about Biden's policies I'd bet they'd approve. The trouble for his campaign is that the good stuff isn't talked about nearly as much as the his age.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Could they even get another primary going before the convention?

It’s not for another month, but…no. I don’t think so. I really hope there’s at least some semblance of voting before all the superdelegates start mouthing off in the press about their preordained candidate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I don't know how that would work with overseas voters on a really short timeframe. Not all mail in the world moves quickly, assuming even that we could get our ballot, fill it, print it, and get it to a post office in short order (me in Japan? yes. People in other countries such as in the Peace Corps in really rural areas? probably no).