Science Memes

11223 readers

4007 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

859

answer = sum(n) / len(n) (lemmy.eco.br)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

129 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just because you don't know what the uncertainties are doesn't mean they're not there.

Most optimization problems can trivially be turned into a statistics problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Most optimization problems can trivially be turned >into a statistics problem.

Sure if you mean turning your error function into some sort of likelihood by employing probability distributions that relate to your error function.

But that is only the beginning. Apart from maybe Bayesian neural networks, I haven't seen much if any work on stuff like confidence intervals for your weights or prediction intervals for the response (that being said I am only a casual follower on this topic).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

One of the better uses I've seen involved using this perspective to turn what was effectively a maximum likelihood fit into a full Gaussian model to make the predicted probabilities more meaningful.

Not that it really matters much how the perspective is used, what's important is that it's there.