this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
459 points (94.9% liked)
Greentext
4482 readers
1855 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you know what they’re testing for, it’s not a good test.
They don't have to tell you the truth. It could have been to test whether being told that it's "men vs women" affects the readings test subjects provide
Also they could tell them after completing all tests/finishing ths study.
Not could, will. These days it's considered unethical not to debrief explaining any deceptive elements of the study. It can also be valuable because the people conducting the study can use it as a chance to find out if the participants knew about the deception, in case that knowledge might have affected the results.
if you think you know what they're testing for, you've been lied to.