this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
468 points (95.9% liked)
World News
32352 readers
408 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The article is misleading, Biden is actually explicitly not ignoring this law that is from 2019: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/jun/30/joe-biden-forced-build-donald-trumps-border-wall/
TLDR: This is a 2019 law passed by Congress during the baby hands administration. The Biden administration has been pretty careful not to overstep other branches of government(I think as a direct response to how flagrantly and harmfully baby hands used executive action), and while Biden returned wall money taken from the DoD, the rest of the wall money was explicitly designated by Congress for building the border wall in 2019 and Congress will not cancel that legislative order(wall funds), despite Biden asking Congress to cancel the 2019 wall funds law since arriving in office in 2020.
This post is misleading, the money is being legally used for a legislatively required purpose and any federal laws are being broken legislatively by Congress as a result of baby hands in 2019, not the Biden administration.
So he’s following the one that’s actually an issue. Cool.
Look. The system works.
Yup. It's too bad that something functioning correctly doesn't mean it's functioning well.
26 laws waived for Biden to build Trump's wall for him, and we won't help the poor because [stack of excuses].
Why are you blaming Biden and not Congress?
Because Congress didn't waive 26 laws to enforce 1.
Wow, you even misunderstood the TLDR.
Congress is building this wall from a baby hands law in 2019 that broke those federal laws, Biden tried to stop the wall legally, Congress told him no, and to your last point he just canceled 90 billion dollars of debt for a poor people.
You could be more wrong, but it would be hard to imagine how.
Alright man enough with the "baby hands" stuff. It was slightly humerus the first time I read it but after seeing you post it for the third time it just makes you look sad now. We get it. You don't like him. You look like a conservative who repeats "sleepy Joe" unironically.
Edit: holy shit you made the same comment 10 times. Nah, I'm good.
As soon as diaper don stops calling names, he'll stop receiving the same treatment.
Oh, and yeah a lot of people were asking why. I just reposted the answer to everybody who asked why this was happening.
Don't worry about it, I don't think anyone's paying attention to you anyway.
Mod hat:
Hey, there are a millions of ways of making fun of Trump without body shaming. Body shaming affects everyone, and Trump will not see your comment.
I completely agree that name calling should be off the table, but as long as baby hands continues to body shame and use pejorative nicknames on public forums, I have no problem with equal treatment.
I don't see the benefits of giving special treatment to abhorrent people.
Okay, well, youre going to be banned if you keep doing it. "But he started it" isnt a valid reason to body shame here.
My argument is not that he started it, my argument is that donnie consistently attacks other people via body shaming and there's no reason why he should not wear the clothes he's fashioned.
Is diaper don okay? Cheeto, is it specifically body shaming that makes you uncomfortable?
If you just like donny and want to use that mod power to protect him, that's your prerogative, I'm just trying to get the rules clear, because Donnie in no way has earned the respect of his proper name.
Cheeto is fine, diapers seems ageist
I'm not being cynical when I say you shouldn't use bigoted insults. I'm literally a trans communist, people like Trump want to kill me.
Thanks for the answer; i always found the Cheeto epithet a little tame since he likes being orange but doesn't like people noticing his hands, but I'll make future donny pejoratives avoid body shaming specifically.
I don't think you're being cynical.
High fives for trans communism, why not travel since there are so many countries and so many of them are nicer and more favorable toward at least one and often both of those lifestyles? I'm assuming you're in the states.
Because this is my home and I'm fighting for it to not be a hellscape. If/when trans genocide measures look like they're going national, I will move.
I realized American capitalist opportunity was a sham and then realized most American ideals were hollow, and the lack of any permanent positive American ideal pretty much did away with any sense of home left for me here, but I respect and appreciate your determination and give my sincere best wishes to your campaign.