this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
441 points (98.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43746 readers
1565 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 210 points 4 months ago (21 children)

Former process engineer in an aluminum factory. Aluminum foil is only shiny on one side and duller on the other for process reasons, not for any "turn this part towards baking, etc" reasons.

It's just easier to double it on itself and machine it to double thickness than it is to hit single thickness precision, especially given how much more tensile strength it gives it.

Also, our QA lab did all kinds of tests on it to settle arguments. The amount of heat reflected/absorbed between the two sides is trivially small. But if you like one side better you should wrap it that way, for sure!

[โ€“] [email protected] 41 points 4 months ago (11 children)

The amount of heat reflected/absorbed between the two sides is trivially small.

Your particular choice of wording here makes me very curious: Do you mean that there really was a measurable difference (which was trivially small)?

[โ€“] [email protected] 104 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Yup, the lab could tell a difference! Shiney side (so mill roller facing, as opposed to the dull side which faces the other layer of aluminum) was marginally more reflective, but I believe (and a former coworker also remembered it as) it was less than a tenth of a percent (<0.1% for the visual folks)

Anyone who says it affects cooking time or something is mistaken, I'd wager.

[โ€“] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago

Yup, the lab could tell a difference!

Awesome!

[โ€“] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Jokes on you.

I baked my casserole with the shiny side up and pulled it out at 59 minutes and 55 seconds, when it was supposed to go for an hour.

So take that Dull Side!

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Welcome to the Dull Side.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Such men are dangerous!

[โ€“] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Today I learned numbers are visuals but words are not. Wtf dude!

[โ€“] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Now that's the kind of industry secrets I opened this thread for.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Any info on surface roughness? I'm thinking shiny side would be smoother and therefore less sticky, though I don't know how much the passivation layer would affect it. Probably no where close to making a difference at the end of the day, but I'm curious.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

It was a fair few years ago, but yeah, the oxidation on it will be so much smoother than the delta in surface roughness that I doubt it'd make much difference. Lemme reach out to a metallurgist from there and see what he thinks!

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Post your spectral emissivity study or GTFO!

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I mean, maybe if you bake a stone cold potato that was in the fridge and then cook it for two hours? But even then we're probably talking about a handful of minutes at the most.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)