this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
665 points (91.0% liked)

News

23376 readers
2387 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Kyle Rittenhouse's sister Faith is seeking $3,000 on a crowdfunding website in a bid to prevent the eviction of herself and her mother Wendy from their home, citing her "brother's unwillingness to provide or contribute to our family."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, the guy I replied to who said:

I’m contradicting the ridiculous argument that existing in public while armed, in an open carry state, is somehow, in and of itself, provocation.

is certainly talking past everyone else since literally no one made that argument.

And then for some reason you criticized me for telling them that no one made that argument, despite that being a fact.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I think you're saying that --correct me if I'm wrong-- him

bringing the AR to the protests is an act of provocation

while the person you're arguing with said

open carry is not uncommon and no one felt provoked

At least that's how I read it. Maybe I'm wrong. I can see how both statements could be true to some extent. Many protesters were from out of state and possibly not familiar with the open carry laws in WI so it's possible they felt threatened immediately. I'm no longer living in the US, and I never lived in an open carry state, so the sight of an AR strapped to a kid would make me uncomfortable in that situation. However, I've also lived in the middle east were the sight of soldiers walking around not in uniform carrying semi automatic rifles was very common and that did not make me uncomfortable. So context is important.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is Kenosha, not Fallujah. If you think people walking around with ARs is a common or non-worrying sight there, you really know nothing about this subject.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand this response. There are several states in the US where open carry is quite common. There's a whole subreddit dedicated to pictures of dudes walking around like para militias. What's your point in comparing it to Fallujah after I already conceded that it likely made many protesters uncomfortable. No need to go all agro on me man, I'm just pointing out the two perspectives that's all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry... you're taking anecdotal pictures from a subreddit to argue that people walking around Kenosha with ARs is a common sight?

I live in an open carry state. I drove through Wisconsin in March. I didn't see a single person walking around with an AR then and I never see them here either.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You took my position:

open carry is not uncommon in Wi

and transformed it into

people walking around Kenosha with AR's is a common sight

These are two completely different statements. Is the opposite of uncommon by default common? Even after I conceded that it would still alarm some people. I don't get it. Is there a different way I should explain myself? I'm so lost :( What am I doing wrong? Maybe I shouldn't have used the word uncommon. There has to be a better word. Maybe surprising?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Okay, if it is not a common sight to see people carrying ARs in Kenosha, then it makes sense that people at a protest would take that as a threat and act accordingly. I really don't know what you're saying here other than doing some ridiculous "both sidesing" when only one side committed murder.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't really remember any more because I had to translate my position through several iterations since it kept getting twisted. I have to figure out how to make my points more direct and succinct. It seems no matter how much preamble and explanation I offer, my position gets twisted one way or another.

All I'm trying to say is that when we argue with the other side (in this case conservatives that defend Rittenhouse) we should be mindful if we are addressing the ethical argument or the legal argument. Typically, conservatives will overstate the legal argument and dismiss the ethical argument.

If I had an elevator pitch it would be this:

>> It's helpful to steelman the opposition to be able to refute it better. <<

That's all. I need to go walk my dog now.