this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
79 points (90.7% liked)
nonononoyes
4667 readers
1 users here now
A sub for things that seem to go so brilliantly wrong, but oh so right.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Makes me wonder why there is no barrier installed to block the path when a train is coming. That sort of thing is all over the place in countries with robust rail travel. It seems like a well-defined crossing so it'd be a no-brainer to install one there.
A) It's a tram
And
B) No there isn't, they share the roads with everyone else
I think it's just a street. So it'd be like installing a barrier on the pavement.
That's true, this appears to be a light rail crossing. But then again that's a pretty large station for just light rail so I'm not sure.
Where I live there are generally no gates for light rail but there are for all pedestrian crossings over ordinary train tracks, which honestly just makes me think we probably should be installing more safety measures for light rail.
Part of the reason why Boston transitioned from streetcars to the subway is how many people died each year after being hit by them. There is definitely no reason in the modern day why rail needs to share space with pedestrian traffic, and protections should be in place in any area where they intersect.
trams at street level are convenient though
also costs much less than grade separating everything
https://www.passport2amsterdam.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/tram-24-amsterdam.jpg
They share the road w/pedestrians in some countries w/robust rail networks.
Were y l8 4 t tram n 2 busy 2 tipe "with"?