this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
230 points (75.4% liked)

Games

16406 readers
1769 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
230
Epic won’t update Fortnite to run on the Steam Deck. Tim Sweeney says Linux is ‘a terrifically hard audience to serve’ (2022) (www.theverge.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
170 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I am fine with someone who set up and runs a successful business that is in no way predatory and is a benefit to employees, consumers, and the companies that use their product to have an excess amount of money. They are doing capitalism the right way and actually earned the benefits.

Games going up to $70 are not becsuse of the 30% cut. They wouldn't go down if that percentage dropped either. I play multiple games that were always sold at $40 or less as full games and they have been massively profitable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So it's not predatory to let games become more expensive while also reducing running costs? Because if you run the numbers it means they're just increasing their profits by charging the same % and forcing devs and publishers to increase the cost of games to compensate for development costs increasing. The only winner here is Valve, maybe you should start defending your own interests instead of defending the interests of a billionaire.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Steam is not making the games more expensive, the game studios/distributors are increasing the prices so they can make more profit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It you need to make 30$/copy to cover costs in 2015 and Steam is taking 30% you need to sell for 43$/copy, Valve is making 13$/copy.

Development costs go up by 20% over the next 10 years, you now need to make 36$/copy to cover costs, with Steam's cut you now need to sell for 51.50$, Valve is making 15.50$/copy.

If it was 15% instead? 35.50$ and 42.50$ would be the prices.

During that time operating costs for Valve has actually gone down though, so they're actually increasing their profits two ways!

But hey, let's defend their business practices so Gaben can buy a seventh yacht!