this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
726 points (98.3% liked)

News

23275 readers
3873 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 69 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

What possible reason would he have to do that...? If he wins, he gets off scot free. If he loses then he'll claim that he won and is being suppressed for political reasons and then get of scot free.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

If he were a traditional candidate, the answer is that the party needs to have a candidate who not only can win, but also supports candidates for lower level elections. A traditional candidate would step aside and nominate someone to take their place. Not sure if the GOP convention rules allow it, but they could possibly even direct their delegates to go towards someone else.

Since Trump is a narcissist who doesn't even get why downstream elections are important for building a political base of support, he'll of course ignore this.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (3 children)

He can’t pardon himself if he wins

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (3 children)

In the event he actually gets incarcerated, if he were to win the presidency he could sue claiming being locked up interferes with his constitutional duties as president. I think I know what this Supreme Court would decide on that

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This Supreme Court has not always been friendly to Trump, nor his cronies, nor conservative causes. Their rulings are all over the place regarding politics. Here's a pile of liberal wins.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

If you have the pile of links why not post them? This is just a screenshot of truncated headlines masquerading as a source.

One of the headlines is "Samuel Alito Is Mad You Can't Be Bigoted Towards Gay People Anymore." This could be an article about the current conservative supreme court protecting the rights of gay people, or it could be an article about how the supreme court is planning to strip rights from gay people. I don't know because you didn't actually post a source, you posted a screenshot of a list of truncated headlines.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There is no way in hell he will see a second of jail time. He needs to, but he won't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Yeah I’m not holding my breath

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Part of me wants to just leave America so I don't have to think about this stuff. Another part wants to stay and try to fix it.

But I'm tired.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We should not speak of Trump pardoning himself as if that's a legitimate power he would have, rather than a batshit crazy end run around the obvious intention of the Constitution.

And in any case, he's been convinced to state crimes, and there's no legal theory to support the idea that he can pardon himself or anyone else for state crimes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No but he could pardon himself on any federal charge. It’s not crazy talk

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We should assume he pocket pardoned both himself and any person who went ballistic trying to make their state charges federal ones.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not sure what you mean about making state charges into federal ones

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Most crimes have a State and Federal equivalent. The legal particulars of a case deciding which variant a suspect gets charged with. For example a State may have a charge for 'Intent to Distribute Narcotics' which a suspect with 10kilos of coke gets arrested for during a traffic stop. The investigation reveals the suspect had driven into the charging state from an adjacent one. Boom: Federal charge now. In Trump's case they may try, or have tried, to argue that it is a federal case due to the relation to interfering with the national election. IMO this will strongly suggest the pardon plan is their intent because Federal cases are more severe, with higher penalties and stronger conviction rates than their equivalent State variants. The only reason I can see wanting to risk greater penalties is the possibility of getting SCOTUS to rule on the appeal and that Trump could pardon himself if elected.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He won't need to, it'll be his "independent" department of justice calling the shots. Sessions and Barr did everything in their power, without committing actual explicit crimes, to keep Trump happy while they were in charge.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The U.S. department of justice does not call the shots in the state of New York.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Right? What do these people think would happen? Trump calls in the military to fight NYPD?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I mean, he's such a fucking idiot, I wouldn't put it past him to suggest it.