this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
70 points (94.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6629 readers
736 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Probably the gun, vortex ring state is scary!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Gun can miss. The ground doesnt.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Weeeellll, orbits do decay. Orbiting is essentially just trying to hit the ground and missing by a little less on each successive orbit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I'd argue that means the ground is constantly missing, but gets lucky once.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Vortex ring can be escaped by speeding up,

The gun still tracks you

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Don't think so, if you increase thrust, you increase your downward force since it reenforces the vortex. You need to try to lurch forward out of the ring.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Yes, speeding up (above 60kt i believe), not speeding upwards.

Increasing torque doesn't help because it doesn't change the conditions of what caused it.

Tbh im just happy they aren't calling it settling with power, which to me is just CFIT.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

The way it was explained to me was to try and shove the cyclic through the windscreen. Full forwards.