this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
135 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18894 readers
2987 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He also took actions which would have a real impact on real people. But since we don't know if he really believes it, both sides are the same.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

All this about contraceptives makes me think the following: in states where the facilitation policy is followed, there will be fewer births and therefore those children will not be educated by people of that ideology, in states where they are not facilitated there will be more births. and those children will be educated with another ideology and therefore people who will gradually emigrate to other states, in the long run what this would cause would be greater political power for the Republicans, the main problem with the wokie ideology is that it is being condemned itself to disappear. The wokes should start reproducing and raising their children correctly or they will be condemned to be outnumbered by the republicans, Republicans are definitely thinking about the long run instead of just getting votes today. Not to mention that a large part of the wookies not only cannot have children but they will not have them. Let's see what will be the stance about adoption but I bet the republican objective will definitely be to avoid wokies to adopt.