this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
660 points (70.5% liked)

Memes

50730 readers
1040 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
660
Defediverse (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

EDIT: no, I don't sympathize with nazis (neither I sympathize with those who call everyone nazi when they're losing an argument ;)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

That is a pretty ironic comment because that is not what the paradox of tolerance is at all. The paradox of tolerance is that intolerance needs to be suppressed for tolerance to exist, since tolerance can't exist alongside intolerance.

The paradox is that tolerance needs to be intolerant towards intolerance in order for a tolerant society to exist, literally the exact opposite of what you wrote.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

actually both definitions are right. hence the name, paradox.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

paradox does not mean 'has two definitions'. It means the ONE definition contains a contraction, i.e. 'tolerance needs to be intolerant towards intolerance in order for a tolerant society to exist' contains a contradiction.

Really can't agree that qyron is right, doesn't seem to know what the paradox of tolerance is