this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
149 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31954 readers
537 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If the system was transparent, open, and provided an easy way to get false positive sorted, I wouldn’t necessarily even have a problem with the concept.

How can you even say that?

This is what baffles me the most: how does anyone even entertain the idea of letting a third-party scan their own files on their own device uninvited? Even if the process is transparent and there's a 100% fool-proof way of taking care of false positives, the very idea of letting anyone scan anything on my computers in the first place is completely unacceptable!

People would have never deeemed anything like this even remotely acceptable 25 years ago. But in 2023, enough people have internalized the idea enough that this actually has a chance to become law without creating an outrage. I am utterly distressed by what society is willing to accept nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your entire line of thinking hinges on the premise that the politicos (and presumably, whichever oligopolies their do the biddings of) will have their way one way or the other. What you're saying is, if we don't make concessions on the client-side scanning and accept some implementation of it, the privacy-respecting tools we have now will be banned.

My question is this: why is any of this inevitable?

None of what's being proposed here solves any problem. Pedo material can be fought with the legal and technical tools we have now, as demonstrated by the news of entire pedo rings being dismantled, and pedophiles going to jail as a result on a regular basis.

The fact that you're willing to make compromises on solutions to a fake problem means that you've already acknowledged we've already lost.

The truth is, if people today were as outraged as people of my generation are over this, this false choice wouldn't have to be made at all. Things are just fine the way they are today, and you don't have to give up anything if you don't assume you'll have to give something up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]