this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
57 points (88.0% liked)

Technology

59217 readers
2949 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The thing falls apart at the "small number of subfolders" thing. To really offload shit, there'd be dozens of subfolders, making the whole thing cumbersome.

Besides, you'd need to shuffle stuff around constantly, ("is this a project or is it finished?) making it hard to find, making the whole thing obsolete.

You'd still need to name and tag and categorize anything behind the subfolders. At that point, you can just ditch the topevel folders and have everything in a system like paperless or something.

Someone who has issues with sorting and categorizing will not profit from that system at all, just create a mess in 4 folders. So it's just one of those systems that is only good if you are already good at sorting and this don't need a system like that in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hmmm, thanks for the thoughts. Any better mental frameworks for organization?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have five things that are related, put them in a folder. Repeat. Eventually you end up with maybe ten distinct folders.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I like this, nice and simple

load more comments (2 replies)