this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
174 points (85.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43826 readers
851 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hear "No problem" far more often.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"You're welcome" was always taught to me as the proper thing, but sounds slightly stilted. They express the same sentiment, roughly, but "[it was] no problem" is arguably clearer about it. I personally just think it's a slightly "nicer" nuance.

Of course, sometimes maybe it actually was a problem, and then I'd only say it if going out of my way to be nice about it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Yes, to me, the nuance is what's important here.

"You're welcome" implies you did something good, and you know it. "I am good for doing this for you. You owe me!"

Whereas "no problem" implies it didn't cause you any trouble. "Doing this for you was not detrimental to my life. You owe me nothing."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree with this hit somehow some older people see it flip-flopped

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

To older people such as myself (who were using the words before you younger people were), “no problem” means “the problem you might expect this situation to have caused is in fact not there”.

It’s for when someone’s gone beyond what they owed you.

A barista owes you that coffee; it’s their job. You are literally, as a paying customer, welcome to that coffee.

But someone who has asked a fellow patron to watch their laptop while they go to the bathroom, has received a favor beyond what the roles make expected. This could be a problem, hence the saying of “No problem” to nullify the implied question “Is there a problem?”

It’s kind of like the way someone might report “No injuries” after a crash (which could conceivably produce injuries).

It’s the spoken second half of this unspoken exchange:

“Problem?”

“No problem”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I grew up saying “you’re welcome” but I don’t interpret “no problem” that way at all. It’s never occurred to me even. I tend to say more “oh, of course!” or “hey anytime” though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Gotcha. Thanks for the explanation

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I really don't think your welcome is meant to mean you owe me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

You owe me

So by saying you are welcome to their action, people are actually saying the opposite? That you are not welcome to it at all? You're saying it's ironic?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=6Qh_P0_9jsc

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

“You’re welcome” means exactly the opposite of “You owe me”