this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
385 points (91.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29612 readers
928 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I had to explain to a friend recently why

"I'm at Steve's house"

Was fine but

"I'm in Steve's house"

Was weird. Like, get out of there before you get arrested.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That reminds me that my sixth grade teacher was adamant that 'I am going over Steve's house" meant that one was visiting the house, not flying over it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I like learning french because it shows me how weird the connections to english are.

"Chez Steve" means "At Steve's [place]". This one is more verbose in english.

But you can say "chez moi" for "at home". And no need to specify which home.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

That's exactly my point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm at Steve's house.

I'm in Steve's backyard.

I'm at Steve's backyard barbecue.

Yeah, English is pretty f'd up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Nah, this kinda does make sense. You wouldn't wanna be inside Steve's barbecue, would you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I would sure appreciate that explanation. Like I broadly get that 'at' implies you are present with the person's knowledge while 'in' implies you are there without their knowledge but I would like an explanation of why the meanings are implied as such