this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
255 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4472 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And Biden did nothing at all to revert Trump's changes?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He has been, but it’s much easier and faster to repeal legislation than it is to enact it. Trump took us back a decade in his first two years in office.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He has been, but it’s much easier and faster to repeal legislation than it is to enact it.

Cool. Let's repeal oil subsidies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That’s part of the Inflation Reduction Act. In the Treasury Department’s Green Book, under the heading “eliminate fossil fuel tax preferences,” 13 current-law provisions will be repealed or replaced, raising $31 billion over 10 years. Additionally, the document details $66 billion of tax increases on the foreign income of U.S. oil and gas companies, costing the industry $97 billion.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I agree that Willow was a disappointment at first. They had existing leases, so they would’ve gotten the license with a subsequent lawsuit regardless. As part of the license agreement, the lease was reduced by a third, and they were required to forgo 68,000 acres of existing leases, which Biden recently included in the new 13 million acre reserve. Overall it was a big step back, and a bigger step forward.

https://www.npr.org/2024/04/20/1246085825/biden-restricts-alaska-oil-gas-leasing-reserve

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Overall it was a big step back, and a bigger step forward.

It was a big step back. I disagree that the step forward mitigates it with anywhere near the significance you're ascribing to it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In regards to climate change, the amount of oil extracted is not as impactful as the amount of land reclaimed. Each drilling site leased creates more CO2, and endangers more wildlife.

We can agree to disagree.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

We can agree to disagree.

Let's.