Technology

34832 readers

16 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Microsoft’s VASA-1 can deepfake a person with one photo and one audio track (arstechnica.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On Tuesday, Microsoft Research Asia unveiled VASA-1, an AI model that can create a synchronized animated video of a person talking or singing from a single photo and an existing audio track. In the future, it could power virtual avatars that render locally and don't require video feeds—or allow anyone with similar tools to take a photo of a person found online and make them appear to say whatever they want.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

We're going to need strong digital signatures on everything, and we need it fast, else we won't be able to believe anything we see. It will be Steve Bannon's "flood the zone with shit" dream come true.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We’re going to need strong digital signatures on everything

That won't help anything considering how easy it is to strip metadata.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean the opposite scenario, where if there's no signature we assume it's fake.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We've had email forgery and signatures to prevent it for decades, but barely anyone does that either.