this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
411 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2202 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 65 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I’d settle for a massive coronary.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I would really prefer to see him live a very long time in prison but with the judiciary refusing to do literally anything to this POS.. fuck it lets go hamburders

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Same. I hope he dies in a supermax, alone, pathetic, miserable, broken.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Him getting that Phil Spector mugshot "what his head really looks like without cosmetic assistance" reveal would be so delightful.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'd love to see it too, but I'm pretty sure that between the the logistics of locking up a former President and the very apparent dementia there's going to be some kind of clemency. As long as he is permanently barred from political activity, is sentenced to some form of house arrest, and of course has to pay whatever restitution is required, I'd be okay with that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

What logistics? You put him in a jail. Works for other people. “What about secret service protection?” They can go there with him. They can go home at night though. If you worry about his safety, put him in his own personal prison on an abandoned military base. It worked for Rudolph Hess.

It’s only hard if you make it hard.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

House arrest is much too lenient for that man. I say this as someone who left their suburban property exactly once in the last 5 years.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago

He really really needs to be tried. It's the only way we'll get past the "you can't indict a president" nonsense.

In some ways, I'd love to see Trump get into office January 20th at noon and then indicted by a federal grand jury at 1pm.

But the headache of him issuing a pardon to himself is not something we're ready for as a nation.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago

poof, you have a massive coronary