Asklemmy

43851 readers

1703 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

222

Why do people say "Catholics and Christians" in (USA) when Catholics are also Christians, as if they refer to it as a different religion. (lemmy.ml)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

180 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Is this some sort of remnant of evangelical puritan protestant ideology?

I don't understaun this.

If you ask me, it'd make as much sense as Orthodox and Christians.... or Shia and Muslim...

I know not all Christians are Catholics but for feck's sake...

They're all Christians to me....

Edit:

It's a U.S thing but this is the sort of things I hear...

https://www.gotquestions.org/Catholic-Christian.html

I am a Catholic. Why should I consider becoming a Christian?

I now know more distinctions (apparently Catholicism requires duty and salvation is process, unlike Protestantism?) but I still think they're of a similar branch (Christianity) so I just wonder the social factor

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I guess I didn't notice in the coverage I watched. Was it the daily mail or just the dreges of the internet?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPYdzIt7p7s

and it got worse after he became PM, then the storm blew over.

didn't help that there was a Hindu celebration that of course he participated in soon after he became PM. I'm not saying it was bad that he did it, I'm saying that it made his standing worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Random racists is just background noise these days. I was comparing media coverage and comments from panelists on things like question time. It was certainly an area of comment for Blair and less so for Sunak from my recollection.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I mean, there's something to be said here about modern history (as in, the scope that's about 10 years ago) that I remember there being some hubbub, but not being bothered/capable enough to find specific examples in the scope you want.

I was there when it happened, and I remember it being discussed in the spheres you're talking about, and that was the example I chose to illustrate my point. If you like, you can do some digging, but I've done my part.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=cPYdzIt7p7s

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.