this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
197 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37799 readers
277 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Guys I didn't write the headline; the subtitle that I added, I've now fixed tho

Edit: Also, the information about there being no escape is out of date -- here's a quick guide to how to fix the problem in the modern day

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If you want to phrase it as a "personal responsibility" thing, then you should frankly be criminally liable if your system is used for a DDOS attack.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Lol.

As long as security updates are bundled with antifeature updates, this amounts to "install candy crush or go to jail!"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You think it's funny for your system to take part in an attack potentially costing billions of dollars in damages because you can't be bothered to switch off of Windows because "you don't like what Microsoft installs with their security updates" or "actually install security updates"?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I'm not sure I follow the last "or" clause, but you can bring the criminal liability to Microsoft if you think it should attach for this reason