Gaming

20179 readers

59 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

260

You can't sue us for making games 'too entertaining,' say major game developers in response to addiction lawsuits (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Let's hear it! I think I've got it, but would love to hear how you put it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Engagement is merely the ability to, or the degree to which you are able to, maintain interaction with something (a system, a game, a fidget toy, whatever) over time. It has absolutely nothing to do with entertainment, although you can use entertainment as a means of achieving or increasing engagement. However, entertainment is hard. People are entertained by different things to different degrees, and respond to their entertainment in different ways. Engagement on the other hand is a fairly simple behavioural matter and that's a whole field of science (which is mostly bollocks, to be fair, but its lessons can be very effective when applied at scale).

Source: I used to be a behavioural engineer, specifically a gamification specialist. Engagement was the oil I was employed to extract, and entertainment the excuse my field used to pretend what we were (and still are) doing isn't just social manipulation at scale.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yes yes yes, I'm very on board with this. I think we all know what we're doing is wrong and manipulative on some level, but the general consciousness hasn't caught up to recognising the tort.

It may be just be association, but I'm not a huge fan of the term "entertainment" either. It strikes the same hollow note for me as "content."

Yes it's an apt description for a part of an experience, but it comes so laden with its own associations and preconceptions, that it doesn't feel useful in most contexts in which it's deployed.

That said I have no objections to how you've used it in your comment.