this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
368 points (86.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers
64 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

    internet speeds are measured in bits so they can artificially inflate numbers.

    cause selling 100mbit sounds a lot meatier than selling 12mbyte.

    [–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

    100 milibits lmao

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

    I mean, yeah. That too.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

    Not quite, network speeds have been measured in bps since the day the first packet got out of its egg.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

    the only realistic reason i can think of this, is to describe over the wire speed. Shits easy enough to convert once you hit the end point though, so meh.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

    Not really. It's easier to measure a count of a thing than it is to measure a count of groups of 8 of a thing. It's just easier to display when you're not wasting the cycles to devide it by 8 all the time.