this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
434 points (98.0% liked)
Comic Strips
12611 readers
3038 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- [email protected]: "I use Arch btw"
- [email protected]: memes (you don't say!)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How about Sherlock? Moffat (not sure of his title but he was in charge of a lot of the writing) built up a big mystery cliffhanger on Watson seeing Sherlock die but it was really Sherlock somehow faking his death.
In the next season (or series depending on where you live) Moffat needed to explain to the audience how Sherlock did it. He needed to show the breadcrumb trail of clues he had set up ahead of time that the audience simply didn't notice or hadn't put together. You know ... the whole point of Sherlock Holmes stories and detective stories in general.
In his infinite genius Moffat had left his loyal and growing audience hanging for ages and didn't do a lick of setup or apparently even have a plan. After building up all that tension he never produced a concrete payoff to the scenario.
It sure did SuBVeRT ExPecTAtioNs! The world expected a professional, renowned writer to have a competent payoff to their big setup and Moffat subverted that by copping out.
ha! i thought i was just too dumb to notice the explanation.
Nope, Moffat just gave a few possible solutions, alluded to there being more, and hoped that smoke and mirrors would make people feel foolish for pointing out that the emperor had no robes.
Fans who were not cowed into silence took to the internet to assure each other that surely episode two would have a concrete explanation. It was only when Moffat still hadn't committed in the second episode that people lost hope, rationalized, or concluded that Sherlock had jumped the shark.
I really did enjoy that show's first 3 seasons, though obviously not the lack of explanation for the fake death. A video essay I watched recently (it's about 2 hours long, click at your own risk) basically explained how the show is and has always been bad. I have to say, it makes some good points, but I don't agree with everything and I did still really enjoy the show when I watched it so that's not going anywhere.
But man, that 4th season and especially the final episode... That was, ugh, something.
That's Hbomb video isn't it?
yup