Asklemmy

43891 readers

1511 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Which games that were reviewed poorly did you actually like? (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally never had a problem with Victoria 3. A bit buggy on release but nothing game breaking

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I feel like most of the negativity came from people playing the poor console versions. If you didn’t try too hard to break it the day 1 PC release was okay. The story is amazing and made more than up for any of the bugs. I had a ton of fun with this game.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

it got the, a bunch of people hated it that havent played it situation. I pointed out that the game between launch and up to the anime release was fundamentally the same game, just with bugfixes. it broke Witcher 3's player count record.

so people are basically insinuating it was never about the game at launch that was bad, at least at a fundamental design level.