World News

32323 readers

866 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

130

Denmark wants to conscript more people for military service - including women, for the first time (apnews.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Slavery, but at least it's not discriminating based on sex.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You should learn more about the Danes and their military. 16 weeks paid work, worker's union, and helping the community. But in 2014 99.1% of the lowly 4,200 spots were filled by volunteers, so good luck actually enjoying that summer camp. Straight to a full-time job or study instead :( Needless to say, this is why you've never heard of a Dane going abroad to escape service lol

This ain't yo momma's US military.

[+] [email protected] -22 points 8 months ago (2 children)

How is that slavery? In a sane country, military service is actually a great tool to teach young adults how to behave within a diverse group and give life skills many lack at that age. In my homeland military service is only mandatory for men and i think it’s a shame and sexist that because I’m a woman I’m considered too fragile to do it.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago (4 children)

You're forcing people to work for you who otherwise wouldn't.

That's textbook slavery.

I'm sure all the arguments you make in favor of it are similar to ones whites made to enslave blacks. "It's good for them." Lol.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In Austria we still have conscription and the officer in charge of our company outright said to us during basic training : "This right here fullfills all the criteria of slavery if conscription wasn't explicitly allowed I'd be in jail now!"

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago

Nope. Text book slavery requires either ownership. Or forced labour without renumeration.

Not saying conscription is good. But slavery is a different thing. And using the term lightly is an insult to those who have faced it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's forced labor. It doesn't get any clearer cut than that. It's slavery.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Nope. Official def is either ownership. Or forced labour without renumeration.

Forced labour with renumeration is not slavery.

Just shitty.