this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
129 points (94.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43896 readers
936 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes, it's technically correct (which we all know is the best kind of correct) and engineers would understand.
Using mm means most everyone (who knows metric) understands that in much more practical terms. A quarter of a tenth of thiiis much is a pretty damn tight fit.
Micrometers is actually so common that it has a colloquial non-SI name of "micron"
According to wiki:
Bold of you to assume that anywhere close to everyone who understands metric would know that 0.25 is a quarter of something.
Bold of you to assume that the country that still uses the Imperial system is the one that better understands fractions.
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/undertheinfluence/how-failing-at-fractions-saved-the-quarter-pounder-1.5979468
I didn't say that imperial countries understand them better.