Greentext

4409 readers

1289 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Anon's uncle watches Andrew Tate (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Women will always get laid more than men.

If we discount homosexual relationships (since the conversation focuses on heterosexuals), for a woman to have sex, there needs to be a man to have sex with her, and vice versa, so men and women should get laid equally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Uh no. It's not 1-1, it's 1-to-many.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Due to Fisher's Principle, we know that there's roughly as many women as men. So why don't you go and take a population of 5 men and 5 women, and show how they can be partnered up in such a way that each woman is on average connected to more men than vice versa. You'll quickly find it impossible, and that's because it is mathematically impossible.