this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
248 points (97.7% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2114 readers
68 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Dude it’s a movie set not a firing range. That’s like saying that since it’s dangerous to drive fast that car chase scenes can’t exceed 25mph. It’s a movie set where the scene calls for people shooting at each other. Of course the actor would assume that the group responsible for making sure the weapons are safe did their job and made sure the weapons were safe. I wouldn’t assume an actor has any idea of how a gun works if it was my job to make sure they have something to point and shoot. The job of the actor is literally to point and shoot in a scene.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

Cillian Murphy actually became a nuclear physicist so he could play Oppenheimer.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.

  1. It was a gun. An actual, functioning firearm. He knew it was a gun & told the police as much afterwards. There is never any good reason to point a gun at someone you are not currently trying to kill. Even if you ignore the common sense and assume there are somehow different rules for movie sets & using blanks, the other armorer they brought in testified that no one should ever be in the line of fire. He absolutely roasted Reed for not telling Baldwin to not point the gun at people in the footage they played for him.

  2. The scene did not call for him to draw his gun, let alone shoot it. He wasn't pointing it at another actor and playing a scene where he shoots someone, he was pointing it at someone behind the camera for no good goddamn reason. We saw from the BTS footage played in court that this was not the first time he pointed a gun at the camera and shot it outside the actual filming of the movie.

  3. Baldwin neglected to do the training for the seated cross draw, the same maneuver he was doing when he killed someone. No doubt Reed was negligent, but even she tried to get him to do that.

I simply do not understand why people are letting Baldwin off the hook. He pointed a loaded gun at someone and pulled the trigger. People fucking die when that happens.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

There is never any good reason to point a gun at someone you are not currently trying to kill.

Yes there is. The good reason is being an actor who is playing a character who's trying to kill someone.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago

But, you see, he's one of the good ones. We must rationalize any way we can to save him. Don't listen to other actors saying they were taught to verify the guns and ammo. Don't listen to crazy gun nuts who say you don't point a gun at people no matter what.

This was purely her fault. Case closed. Do not look any further into it.