this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
76 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

34832 readers
16 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I like how gaps make things feel a little less cluttered, and show off the colors of my wallpaper. Same reason I use i3 with gaps on. It feels like everything is nicely organized instead of shoved together. In the end it's just an aesthetic preference.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Of course! To each their own.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'm surprised you find that the gaps makes things feel less cluttered. Imo it looks considerably more cluttered.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

how's more white space going to make it more cluttered

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

It's a feel thing. I have two screens, with a minimalistic bar taking about 15 pixels on the top side of the secondary monitor. No opened apps or anything displayed there, to see that I'll just press Alt tab or the plasma overview (very gnome-like). That feels less cluttered than a bar that, to have the floating effect, steals me more vertical space than what I have.

This is very personal so it's nice that KDE let's us do whatever we want. IDK about the default choices as long as they let us change it to whatever we like, so I don't really care.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

It's additional space around components showing what's behind it. So you're seeing more stuff in between windows, making it look less organised imo. The "whitespace" isn't really white here. It looks like another unnecessary element crammed inbetween two windows that might as well just sit neatly next to one another, making the windows slightly larger. I also like being able to move my mouse to the edge of things (e.g. the taskbar) without ending up in the whitespace, which causes misclicks for me.

Again, my opinion. Not stating absolute truths here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Off-topic, but there's a cat that lives nearby that has your name

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well tell him to give it back

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I can't. He wears it too well

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Meh. I have a 1px gap for all my windows on bspwm. But I also have no bar at all. I just commit one workspace to a full screen btop on session start.

Am I wasting screen space? Probably...at the end of the day, I feel more organized, but others could easily point out that ideally I'd have 0 gaps and no btop and no bar, and that would be best for organization. Afaic, it's just personal preference.