this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
109 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59398 readers
2959 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 63 points 8 months ago (12 children)

“Established copyright doctrine will dictate that the Times cannot prevent AI models from acquiring knowledge about facts, any more than another news organization can prevent the Times itself from re-reporting stories it had no role in investigating,” OpenAI writes.

Oh boy, their defense is that their advanced predictive text can acquire knowledge? Please, proceed.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 8 months ago (11 children)

It would be a plausible defense if the AI model wasn’t regurgitating Times articles verbatim.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (10 children)

It still is defensible. I can quote a whole bunch of lines from “talladega nights” and “old school” verbatim. I can sing the entirety of “Amish paradise”, with close to 100% accuracy.

My recall ability does not mean that I’ve violated copyright.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you write it down and sell it you 100% do violate copyright

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Google be in trouble then

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)