this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
544 points (98.1% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5764 readers
672 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Somehow, I'm not surprised. Old tech is trusty, reliable, simple. I'm pretty sure banks often run on old tech for the same reasons. It drives me nuts seeing computers in place of simple controls.

For instance, as an appliance tech I've been getting familiar with the latest common GE dishwasher design the past couple years and discovered the computer boards are a common failure point. There's actually 2 of em--one main computer board doing most of the "heavy lifting", and a separate computer board for the user interface that wires up to the main cpu. That board for the user interface is a very common failure point (though the other one likes to go bad sometimes too). They're not even that expensive to buy, but they're endlessly more complicated than a standard control panel with mechanical buttons, lights/LEDs and a small screen displaying the time, or something even simpler like a mechanical timer that you simply advance to the cycle you want to run.

The technology has existed for longer than many of us have even been alive--nobody's building them anymore though...

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

It's always interesting to find a control system that's actually Windows 98 or 2000 running on it.